1. Who responded

What this section tells you: Who responded to the survey—how many, from which regions and organization types, and how primary roles are distributed across regions. Use filters to check coverage and whether key participants are represented.

Survey responses
Regions represented
Unique organizations

Respondents by region

Respondents by organization type

Primary roles across regions

2. Coordination capacity and decision-making

What this section tells you: How respondents rate changes in coordination capacity (Q6) and fairness, transparency, and inclusiveness (Q7) across regions, plus how lead applicants/project managers compare to others (Q8). Spot where capacity grows and how decision‑making is perceived.

Coordination capacity change (Q6) by region

Fair/transparent/inclusive/equitable (Q7) by region

Lead applicants / PMs vs others (Q8)

3. Outreach and engagement patterns

What this section tells you: Which outreach approaches are used for different constituencies and how coverage varies by region. Identify methods used most, audiences receiving engagement, and gaps that may need attention.

Outreach activities heatmap

Outreach coverage by region

4. Landowner interest and socially disadvantaged growers

What this section tells you: Regional views on landowner incentive clarity (Q9) and support for socially disadvantaged growers (Q10), and how those two measures relate. Highlights regions that may need deeper engagement or clearer incentives.

Landowner interest and incentives (Q9) by region

Support for socially disadvantaged growers (Q10) by region

Agreement comparison: SD growers vs Landowner interest

5. Disadvantaged and Tribal communities

What this section tells you: Agreement that meaningful benefits for disadvantaged communities and Tribes are understood (Q11), and the extent to which feedback is incorporated (Q13) by group. Reveals strengths and gaps in equitable benefit design.

DAC meaningful benefits understood (Q11) by region

Tribal meaningful benefits understood (Q11) by region

Feedback incorporated into priorities (Q13)

6. Inclusive priority-setting

What this section tells you: Whether regional priority‑setting processes are inclusive and equitable (Q12) by region, and whether outreach‑focused roles perceive the process differently from others. Points to alignment or disconnect between implementers and outreach teams.

Inclusive and equitable process (Q12) by region

Outreach roles vs others (Q12)

7. Alignment and partnerships

What this section tells you: Where alignment and partnership development are strongest (Q7 agreement by region) and which partner organizations are most frequently mentioned (Q15). Use it to recognize effective collaboration and key partners.

Coordination and partnership development (Q7) agreement by region

Top mentioned partner organizations (Q15)

8. Key themes from comments

What this section tells you: The major comment themes, illustrative quotes, and a word cloud summarizing language used. Quickly surfaces common barriers, needs, and successes in respondents’ own words.

Comment themes

Representative quotes

Comments Word Cloud

Annex table

What this section tells you: A simple, filter‑aware table view of the underlying responses for quick review and export.